| Should
women be allowed to play the British Open?
I am penning this column knowing that when my wife and, worst
still, my mother reads it they will undoubtedly take umbrage with
my view and give it to me with both barrels.
However, it won’t change my position that women should not
be allowed to play in the British Open – the oldest and
most treasured of all the men’s major championships. That’s
right ... men’s major championships.
The thought of a woman teeing up against men in a bid for the
Auld Claret Jug would send Old Tom Morris and his contemporaries
into a collective grave spin. But the day is closer than you think.
The Royal & Ancient Club of St Andrews, which organises the
145-yearold championship, has been conducting discussions behind
closed doors about re-wording the conditions of entry for the
British Open.
R&A Chief Executive Peter Dawson said the current rules state
the tournament is open to “any male professional or male
amateur golfer whose playing handicap does not exceed scratch.”
He said a rule change to take out the word “male”
was “under
consideration by the Royal & Ancient Championship Committee”.
“Not that I want to see the Open as a dual-sex event because
golf at the elite level is not being played like that,”
Mr Dawson said. “That wording was put in place at a time
when it was never thought that women would want
to enter. But the R&A is not in the business of keeping women
out of the Open,” Mr Dawson said.
This proposed rule change could turn one of golf’s great
events into a circus where the winner would play second ? ddle
to an off beat news story.
Look at the history of women playing in men’s golf tournaments
thus far. Who could forget Annika Sorenstam’s teary departure
from the PGA Tour’s Bank of America Colonial tournament
in 2003? Or teenage sensation
Michelle Wie nearly making the cut at the Sony Open last year?
Unforgettable publicity stunts I say. The motive of the sponsors
and promoters of both events, in extending invitations to both
women, was for nothing more than pushing their product. Sorenstam
and Wie generated double the number of TV viewers for both tournaments
and we all know that equates to big dollars for the sponsors,
promoters and TV networks.
For the record, does anyone remember who actually won the 2003
Colonial and 2004 Sony Open? It was Kenny Perry and Ernie Els
respectively.
The R&A does not need to go to such lengths to encourage spectators,
TV viewers or sponsors. The great attraction is the event itself.
Allowing a woman to play the British Open will surely see the
earth tremble in the St Andrews cemetery … may Old Tom rest
in peace.
Email your feedback to golf@horwitz.com.au
|